Conjugation of thaptw

Here you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Greek, and more.
Post Reply
Thucydides
Textkit Fan
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:46 pm
Location: Christ Church Oxford

Conjugation of thaptw

Post by Thucydides »

Thaptw: aorist passive etafhn (epsilon, tau, alpha, phi, eta, nu)

What's the explanation for this? The aspiration seems to have changed place.

Just guessing, I would say that the tau has dissimilated because of the phi. But why the phi? Perhaps it was expecting (or making the analogy with?) another theta aorist passive (luw etc), hence the aspiration?

Sorry if that sounds confused. I hope you get the general idea.

Thucydides

Ptolemaios
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 7:15 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Ptolemaios »

The explanation is that originally both t and p were aspirated. With the formation of the present stem, the p lost its aspiration, so that there was no reason for the t to dissimilate. In the aorist stem, the aspiration of p was retained; the t then lost its aspiration.

I don't have references to any grammars (Smyth, Kühner, Sihler, Rix &c.) at the moment, but if you need them, I could look it up.

Ptolemaios

annis
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 3399
Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
Location: Madison, WI, USA
Contact:

Post by annis »

This process Ptolemaios is describing is known as Grassman's Law, and applies to Greek and Sanskrit. When two aspirates follow one another, the first is unaspirated. However, when the -t- was added to the present stem, the final phi lost aspiration, so the theta remained at the beginning.

The same process accounts for the paradigm of "hair": θρίξ, τριχός, ἡ.
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;

whiteoctave
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:42 pm
Location: Cambridge

Post by whiteoctave »

and the rough breathing on the future of ἔχω.

~dave

Paul
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 708
Joined: Sun Jun 15, 2003 4:47 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Post by Paul »

Hi,

To beat a dead horse:

original root θαφ + τ > θαπτ. The initial aspirate is allowed to stand because the subsequent aspirate disappeared into the πτ.

But Grassman's law operates in the 2d aorist passive giving ἐτάφην < ἐθάφην.

There are cases where Grassman doesn't operate, e.g., 1st aorist passive, m-p perfect imperative and infinitive, respectively:

ἐθάφθην
τεθάφθω
τεθάφθαι

Cordially,

Paul

Skylax
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 672
Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:18 am
Location: Belgium

Post by Skylax »

annis wrote: When two aspirates follow one another,
I think we must add "without being adjacent to each other".

Otherwise, there would not be forms like [size=134]ἤχθην[/size] from [size=134]ἄγω[/size] or [size=134]ἀνήφθω [/size] from [size=134]ἀνάπτω [/size]

Thucydides
Textkit Fan
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:46 pm
Location: Christ Church Oxford

Post by Thucydides »

Gosh, I didn't know you were all so interested in the dissimilation of aspirates! Thanks for your help.

The word "taphos" is further evidence of all this.

Another interesting case in trefw, actually from the stem "thref" as we see in the future...

-Thucydides

Thucydides
Textkit Fan
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2003 9:46 pm
Location: Christ Church Oxford

Post by Thucydides »

Would anyone be interested in me writing up the relevant section from Sihler (Comparative Grammar of Latin and Greek) on Grassman's Law?

Ptolemaios
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 79
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2003 7:15 am
Location: The Netherlands

Post by Ptolemaios »

Sihler paragr. 138, pp. 142-144.

Ptolemaios

Post Reply