apparatus criticus

Here you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Greek, and more.
Post Reply
Lavrentivs
Textkit Fan
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:50 pm

apparatus criticus

Post by Lavrentivs »

The apparatus of Aristotelis Physica (ed. Ross, 1950) has the letter M. e.g., ‘om. MS’ I take to mean ‘omiserunt M et Simplicius’; but there is no mention of any M in the praefatione . . . ?

Qimmik
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:15 pm

Re: apparatus criticus

Post by Qimmik »

"MS" usually means "manuscript." I don't enough about the textual history of Aristotle's Physics to be able to help you beyond that, but maybe that will give you a clue.

Victor
Textkit Fan
Posts: 253
Joined: Fri Sep 13, 2013 1:19 am

Re: apparatus criticus

Post by Victor »

Lavrentivs wrote:The apparatus of Aristotelis Physica (ed. Ross, 1950) has the letter M. e.g., ‘om. MS’ I take to mean ‘omiserunt M et Simplicius’; but there is no mention of any M in the praefatione . . . ?
You seem to be asking two separate questions. Is it M or MS you can't fathom out? In the absence of further context, MS would, as Qimmik points out, ordinarily stand for "manuscript". The abbreviation M is listed in the Sigla facing the first page of text in the OCT; we are told it stands for "Aristotelis Metaphysica". On what page of the OCT do we encounter "om. MS"?

OK, a bit of an update. I've found an instance of "om. MS" in the apparatus in reference to the word κινητῷ at 200b, line 32. The word κινητῷ is in square brackets in the text, which means Ross thinks the word is out of place and should probably be deleted.
"om. MS" after κινητῷ in the apparatus means that both a corresponding passage in the codices of the Metaphysics and a citation of this passage in Simplicius' commentary also omit the word.

See the first paragraph of the Praefatio for Ross's explanation of the value of the Metaphysics codices and Simplicius' commentaries in establishing an accurate text.

Lavrentivs
Textkit Fan
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:50 pm

Re: apparatus criticus

Post by Lavrentivs »

thanks! either I overlooked the sigla, or they weren't in the copy I had when I asked. L.

Lavrentivs
Textkit Fan
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:50 pm

Re: apparatus criticus

Post by Lavrentivs »

Yes, it’s actually missing from my copy from 1950.

Post Reply