Textkit Logo

I'm glad somebody is thinking about the future!

Textkit is a learning community- introduce yourself here. Use the Open Board to introduce yourself, chat about off-topic issues and get to know each other.

Moderators: thesaurus, Jeff Tirey

I'm glad somebody is thinking about the future!

Postby pster » Tue Jul 09, 2013 6:06 pm

User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1069
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am

Re: I'm glad somebody is thinking about the future!

Postby Markos » Wed Jul 10, 2013 12:58 am

WOULDN'T it be easier if the word "the" was just simply a letter?

Well at least one person seems to think so. Aussie restaurateur, Paul Mathis has invented a new letter of the alphabet to replace the word "the" because he thinks it is more efficient. The letter looks like the Cyrillic letter 'Ћ'. If an upper case T and a lower case h were to have a typographic baby, this is what it would look like.


This will never happen because it makes too much sense.
Markos
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1456
Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:07 pm
Location: Colorado

Re: I'm glad somebody is thinking about the future!

Postby daivid » Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:40 am

Markos wrote:
WOULDN'T it be easier if the word "the" was just simply a letter?

Well at least one person seems to think so. Aussie restaurateur, Paul Mathis has invented a new letter of the alphabet to replace the word "the" because he thinks it is more efficient. The letter looks like the Cyrillic letter 'Ћ'. If an upper case T and a lower case h were to have a typographic baby, this is what it would look like.


This will never happen because it makes too much sense.


One of the great legacies of Greece is to perfect the alphabetic system. If you were going to introduce a letter for the it would be to revive the old English ð. This was lost to the English language because the first printers in England learnt their trade in the Netherlands and when they set up presses in England they couldn't bother to have a new letter cut. Some use "y" as a substitute. Hence the spelling of "the" as "ye" is not the result of medieval pronunciation but of early modern printing.
And if you were going to reintroduce ð it would make sense to also use θ for the unvoiced form.
Hence breath would be breaθ and breathe breað.

Having said all that there are far more serious divergences from the alphabetic principle that are a far higher priority than the <th> sound. Spelling breath as we actually say it as breth to name but one.

Having single letter for "the" would be a step towards a syllabary. Do we really want to go back to Linear B?
λονδον
User avatar
daivid
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 1234
Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:51 pm
Location: ὁ τοῦ βασιλέως λίθος, London, Europe


Return to Open Board

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 22 guests