Why Not Herodotos?
- Scribo
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:28 pm
- Location: Between Ilias and Odysseia (ok sometimes Athens).
Why Not Herodotos?
For the reading groups etc? Basically...I've wasted a lot of my free time these last few months and need a kick up the backside and Herodotos is great, we don't have to do it all.
(Occasionally) Working on the following tutorials:
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: Antwerpen
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I want to start reading Herodotos in a month or so, after having finished Plato's Symposium. But my Greek is only intermediate level at best, so I'm far from sure if I can keep up with you.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 8:58 pm
- Location: Rhenen
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I was also thinking about Herodotus. I will be on holiday for the next three weeks (indeed, going to Greece ) but after that I would love to join a reading group.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
My local library has:
Michael A. Flower, John Marincola, Herodotus: Histories Book IX. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. review: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2003/2003-07-14.html
So I might be dipping into book IX. Helma Dik wrote her dissertation on Herodotus which I have read so many times I have it almost memorized. She approaches it from her own variant of Functional Grammar which is more accessible than other variants I am familiar with.
On the other hand, I am a little weary of reading about wars. It seems that historians both ancient and modern think that war is the only thing worth writing about.
Michael A. Flower, John Marincola, Herodotus: Histories Book IX. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. review: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2003/2003-07-14.html
So I might be dipping into book IX. Helma Dik wrote her dissertation on Herodotus which I have read so many times I have it almost memorized. She approaches it from her own variant of Functional Grammar which is more accessible than other variants I am familiar with.
On the other hand, I am a little weary of reading about wars. It seems that historians both ancient and modern think that war is the only thing worth writing about.
C. Stirling Bartholomew
- Scribo
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:28 pm
- Location: Between Ilias and Odysseia (ok sometimes Athens).
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I hadn't thought of 9 actually. I definitely envisioned 1 being there, probably skip 2 and its bloody Egyptian logoi...
Actually one of the reasons I thought about Herodotos is that, despite the wars, its a treasure trove of Greek culture and ethnography and owes a massive debt to Homer. He's just great to read. So dw, its not all fighting. It even has a guy dancing naked, upside, on a table with no underwear.
I'll have to check that book out, I've her book on Tragic Word Order. Its very interesting, I usually shy away from these more modern theoretical linguistic works but I liked it.
Actually one of the reasons I thought about Herodotos is that, despite the wars, its a treasure trove of Greek culture and ethnography and owes a massive debt to Homer. He's just great to read. So dw, its not all fighting. It even has a guy dancing naked, upside, on a table with no underwear.
I'll have to check that book out, I've her book on Tragic Word Order. Its very interesting, I usually shy away from these more modern theoretical linguistic works but I liked it.
(Occasionally) Working on the following tutorials:
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Functional Grammar FG is modern but not at all new. Some of the SIL[1] folks who studied under Talmy Givón in their youth are now retired. FG is useful for discussion of pragmatic marking and a few other things. Not something I get excited about now days.Scribo wrote: I've her book on Tragic Word Order. Its very interesting, I usually shy away from these more modern theoretical linguistic works but I liked it.
[1]SIL-International http://www.sil.org
C. Stirling Bartholomew
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 8:58 pm
- Location: Rhenen
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Seriously, shall we pick a book and get started July5? I'm game.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:07 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Scribo asked
So, if an author is harder than Homer, and not as good as Homer, why would you read him instead of Homer?
I'll tell you why not. I'll tell you why I, for one, have stayed away from Herodotos. My sense is that he is a little harder than Homer. You still have the weird Ionic forms you have to learn, plus you have the more complicated Attic-like syntax. And Herodotos is nowhere near as good a writer as Homer. At Homer's sentences one stops and marvels. I don't think anyone would ever say that about Herodotus.Why Not Herodotos?
So, if an author is harder than Homer, and not as good as Homer, why would you read him instead of Homer?
- Scribo
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:28 pm
- Location: Between Ilias and Odysseia (ok sometimes Athens).
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Haha well now this is all subjective and certainly any appreciation of Homer must also be won from understanding related texts, there are a myriad of reasons to read elsewhere.Markos wrote:Scribo askedI'll tell you why not. I'll tell you why I, for one, have stayed away from Herodotos. My sense is that he is a little harder than Homer. You still have the weird Ionic forms you have to learn, plus you have the more complicated Attic-like syntax. And Herodotos is nowhere near as good a writer as Homer. At Homer's sentences one stops and marvels. I don't think anyone would ever say that about Herodotus.Why Not Herodotos?
So, if an author is harder than Homer, and not as good as Homer, why would you read him instead of Homer?
I don't think Herodotos is much harder than Homer, if at all, I certainly think he's best enjoyed in a group. From a purely language pov its worth mentioning that reading him helps not only with epic but also with the pre-Socratic philosophers and, tbf, most prose.
However whilst I'm happy the way this thread is going, people ought to feel free to suggest other authors. I just want it to be prose and not hitherto covered, nor too late. Also easily accessible, so no fragments of Hellanikos or whatever.
(Occasionally) Working on the following tutorials:
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I have only dabbled on and off in Herodotos whlle reading monographs and grammars which cite him. Didn't get blown away by the difficulty. Certainly easier than Tragedy.Scribo wrote: I don't think Herodotos is much harder than Homer, if at all, I certainly think he's best enjoyed in a group. From a purely language pov its worth mentioning that reading him helps not only with epic but also with the pre-Socratic philosophers and, tbf, most prose.
C. Stirling Bartholomew
-
- Administrator
- Posts: 2744
- Joined: Sat Jul 16, 2011 1:51 pm
- Location: ὁ τοῦ βασιλέως λίθος, London, Europe
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I will probably be struggling to keep up but if it is Herodotos I will at least give it a try.
λονδον
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
For those in the dark, or worried about the differences in Herodotus vs. other authors, Geoffrey Steadman's edition of Book 1 is a good place to start. It is available by CC license at http://geoffreysteadman.com/files-herodotus/. It provides a nice core vocabulary list and running vocabulary for the text itself.
As to this post from Markos:
Cheers,
Eliot
As to this post from Markos:
Your sense is that he is harder, suggesting that you haven't delved too deeply. If true, how can you know that he is "nowhere near as good a writer as Homer"? That said, reading Homer prior to Herodotus does, I believe, enlighten Herodotus' project quite a bit.Markos wrote:I'll tell you why not. I'll tell you why I, for one, have stayed away from Herodotos. My sense is that he is a little harder than Homer. You still have the weird Ionic forms you have to learn, plus you have the more complicated Attic-like syntax. And Herodotos is nowhere near as good a writer as Homer. At Homer's sentences one stops and marvels. I don't think anyone would ever say that about Herodotus.
So, if an author is harder than Homer, and not as good as Homer, why would you read him instead of Homer?
Cheers,
Eliot
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: Antwerpen
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Steadman is also working on an annotated edition of book VII. A beta-version is already available http://geoffreysteadman.com/herodotus-7/
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I like the format. The running vocabulary certainly cuts down on the lexical work for students doing a quick read through.Bart wrote:Steadman is also working on an annotated edition of book VII. A beta-version is already available http://geoffreysteadman.com/herodotus-7/
C. Stirling Bartholomew
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:07 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
That's a fair point. I will read some more Herodotos and test my initial impressions.Elliot wrote: Your sense is that he is harder, suggesting that you haven't delved too deeply. If true, how can you know that he is "nowhere near as good a writer as Homer"?
Clayton on Steadman:
I'm sold on the format, because, although it is Grammar-Translation, it is MINIMAL Grammar-Translation, and it allows the reader to get back to reading the Greek as quickly as possible. Steadman's site says that Oedipus Rex is coming out this summer, which is noteworthy as the first attempt to do Greek drama with the format. Up until now, both Steadman and Hayes-Nimis have chosen fairly easy texts.I like the format. The running vocabulary certainly cuts down on the lexical work for students doing a quick read through.
- Paul Derouda
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 2292
- Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 9:39 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I just finished the Agamemnon of Aeschylus and might read a bit of Herodotus. But don't count on me. I think the most natural point to start is from the beginning, that is book 1.
For me, whether somebody who lived 2500 years ago was a good writer or not is secondary. What I mean is that even a bad writer can be important and interesting. Take the guy who wrote the Gospel of Mark for example... (Ok, I'm being provocative, maybe the Gospel of Mark isn't bad writing, but the style is a bit naive.) Good writing is a plus but even bad writers can teach us a lot.
For me, whether somebody who lived 2500 years ago was a good writer or not is secondary. What I mean is that even a bad writer can be important and interesting. Take the guy who wrote the Gospel of Mark for example... (Ok, I'm being provocative, maybe the Gospel of Mark isn't bad writing, but the style is a bit naive.) Good writing is a plus but even bad writers can teach us a lot.
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Just so you know, if you do have some vocabulary help (for any words that are not common*), Herodotus is pretty simple. I never delved into Ionic but never had problems with Herodotus. There's a very definite but rather small list of differences between Ionic and Attic and, with a little bit of time and practice (really, really little) you're golden.
*For example, I got pretty screwed up by being too blase about the whole thing and having to translate in Uni a part about votive offerings in Delphi.
*For example, I got pretty screwed up by being too blase about the whole thing and having to translate in Uni a part about votive offerings in Delphi.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
This arrived yesterday at the library. It is a small format paperback, with type just on the margin of difficult for people beyond sixty yo. There are about 215 pages of commentary and the rest is introduction, text and appendices. Tried to read it but the binding is so tight I can not see the type in the gutter without breaking the back on the book. Anyway, I don't suppose anyone here is going to be reading book 9 if you start from the beginning.Michael A. Flower, John Marincola, Herodotus: Histories Book IX. Cambridge Greek and Latin Classics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. review: http://bmcr.brynmawr.edu/2003/2003-07-14.html
Not much interest here in reading Acts so I am sort of casting about for a new project.
C. Stirling Bartholomew
- Scribo
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:28 pm
- Location: Between Ilias and Odysseia (ok sometimes Athens).
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Ok well we can put it off if you like, I heard 5th of July to be the date anyway, so you might chance you're mind. Though by then I'll be elbow deep in Latin so it will be a nice change of pace. Plus I'm teaching Sanskrit for Classicists as a summer thing so I need Herodotos.Paul Derouda wrote:I just finished the Agamemnon of Aeschylus and might read a bit of Herodotus. But don't count on me. I think the most natural point to start is from the beginning, that is book 1.
For me, whether somebody who lived 2500 years ago was a good writer or not is secondary. What I mean is that even a bad writer can be important and interesting. Take the guy who wrote the Gospel of Mark for example... (Ok, I'm being provocative, maybe the Gospel of Mark isn't bad writing, but the style is a bit naive.) Good writing is a plus but even bad writers can teach us a lot.
I totally agree with comment on quality but we've had this discussion elsewhere and we all agree.
Did you have Voskos as teacher? Curiosity.IreneY wrote:Just so you know, if you do have some vocabulary help (for any words that are not common*), Herodotus is pretty simple. I never delved into Ionic but never had problems with Herodotus. There's a very definite but rather small list of differences between Ionic and Attic and, with a little bit of time and practice (really, really little) you're golden.
*For example, I got pretty screwed up by being too blase about the whole thing and having to translate in Uni a part about votive offerings in Delphi.
For Herodotos most of the commentaries I've been looking at have been historical, I'll keep looking.
(Occasionally) Working on the following tutorials:
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 73
- Joined: Mon Dec 26, 2011 9:00 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
How and Wells' commentary (1912), available on Project Gutenberg, seems to be, still, the only complete commentary in English. When reading H. in translation (Grene) many years ago, I found their commentary to be quite helpful.Scribo wrote:For Herodotos most of the commentaries I've been looking at have been historical, I'll keep looking.
Cheers,
Eliot
- Scribo
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:28 pm
- Location: Between Ilias and Odysseia (ok sometimes Athens).
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Yes I have the second volume of that version. Elsewise there is, ignoring the Cambridge Green and Yellows etc:
A B Lloyd Commentary on Herodotos II (only 1-98)
L Scott's Historical Commentary on VI
D Ascheri, A Lloyd and A Corcella on I-IV
Then the usual stuff, monographs, edited volumes, extended discussions (e.g on the logoi in V). Obviously I could find more by digging around the stacks, but this stuff is cited a lot so. I don't mind the Cambridge Green and Yellows but they're expensive and I find students have a horrid tendency to heavily annotate them like little bastards whom if I ever were to catch the papers would have to write an Aeschylean tragedy of an article.
EDIT: I also need to point out that my primary interest in Herodotos is his relation to ethnographic, geographic and epic traditions on one hand and epistemology on the other, rather than purely literary or historical this time around. Again whilst I'm happy Herodotos is going forward, anyone really should feel free to throw in an alternative.
A B Lloyd Commentary on Herodotos II (only 1-98)
L Scott's Historical Commentary on VI
D Ascheri, A Lloyd and A Corcella on I-IV
Then the usual stuff, monographs, edited volumes, extended discussions (e.g on the logoi in V). Obviously I could find more by digging around the stacks, but this stuff is cited a lot so. I don't mind the Cambridge Green and Yellows but they're expensive and I find students have a horrid tendency to heavily annotate them like little bastards whom if I ever were to catch the papers would have to write an Aeschylean tragedy of an article.
EDIT: I also need to point out that my primary interest in Herodotos is his relation to ethnographic, geographic and epic traditions on one hand and epistemology on the other, rather than purely literary or historical this time around. Again whilst I'm happy Herodotos is going forward, anyone really should feel free to throw in an alternative.
(Occasionally) Working on the following tutorials:
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 8:58 pm
- Location: Rhenen
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I'll be starting then with book I. Anyone with me?Scribo wrote:I heard 5th of July to be the date anyway
- IreneY
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
- Location: U.S.A (not American though)
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Scribo no never had Voskos, I think it was one of the most useless profs I've ever met by the name Xydas. At least I think so
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 8:58 pm
- Location: Rhenen
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
OK, so there's no reading plan yet, I think? I will start reading book 1 from this friday onwards. Don't know whether posting about it will be useful. Without a plan, discussions tend to go off topic or into too much detail very soon.
Is someone still on? Can we agree on some sort of tempo (1 book a month, every two weeks?), which books to skip, which books to read?
Is someone still on? Can we agree on some sort of tempo (1 book a month, every two weeks?), which books to skip, which books to read?
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: Antwerpen
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I finished Plato's Symposium today (what a great read!) and will start Herodotus book I tomorrow. However I will be rather slow, since I intend to take up North & Hillard's Greek Prose Composition as well.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:07 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Let us know how these compare. How much harder (if at all) is Plato than Herodotus, and how much more delightful (if at all) to read?Bart:
I finished Plato's Symposium today (what a great read!) and will start Herodotus book I tomorrow.
In my humble opinion Plato is the greatest Greek writer ever not named Homer.
Are you using Steadman?
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Why not Herodotus?
After listening to most of Elizabeth Vandiver's 24 lectures on Herodotus I have decided to do some more work in Sophocles. Just personal preference. Sophocles is dealing with issues that I find more compelling than reading ancient historians.
I have made a curious discovery after listening about 100 of Elizabeth Vandiver's lectures. I am not really terribly enthusiastic about the ancient Greek foundations of western civilization. Plato and Aristotle leave me cold. I read Lawrence Ferlinghetti and Mark Twain at a tender age. There is something in Sophocles and Euripides that I can connect with.
After listening to most of Elizabeth Vandiver's 24 lectures on Herodotus I have decided to do some more work in Sophocles. Just personal preference. Sophocles is dealing with issues that I find more compelling than reading ancient historians.
I have made a curious discovery after listening about 100 of Elizabeth Vandiver's lectures. I am not really terribly enthusiastic about the ancient Greek foundations of western civilization. Plato and Aristotle leave me cold. I read Lawrence Ferlinghetti and Mark Twain at a tender age. There is something in Sophocles and Euripides that I can connect with.
C. Stirling Bartholomew
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 2966
- Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 8:07 pm
- Location: Colorado
- Contact:
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
C. S. Bartholomew wrote:Why not Herodotus?
After listening to most of Elizabeth Vandiver's 24 lectures on Herodotus I have decided to do some more work in Sophocles. Just personal preference. Sophocles is dealing with issues that I find more compelling than reading ancient historians.
Check out Steadman's Oedipus Rex:
http://geoffreysteadman.com/sophocles/
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
I would like to "check it out" but don't have a library handy that has if on the shelf. Not in a book buying mode, currently disposing of my library.Markos wrote:C. S. Bartholomew wrote:Why not Herodotus?
After listening to most of Elizabeth Vandiver's 24 lectures on Herodotus I have decided to do some more work in Sophocles. Just personal preference. Sophocles is dealing with issues that I find more compelling than reading ancient historians.
Check out Steadman's Oedipus Rex:
http://geoffreysteadman.com/sophocles/
EDIT: the 1982 edition is available locally, just put it on hold. Someone else has the only copy checked out so it will be a while.
C. Stirling Bartholomew
- Scribo
- Global Moderator
- Posts: 917
- Joined: Fri Feb 22, 2008 2:28 pm
- Location: Between Ilias and Odysseia (ok sometimes Athens).
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Fair enough, I guess things just got a bit lost. God knows I've been rushed off my feet.
However, Sophokles sounds like a good alternative, he works well with Homer and Herodotos anyway (the exact nature of the link between him and Herod. is debated incidentally). But yeah, I can sort of stand Sophokles, I get great use out of his fragments and recently re-read his entire extant corpus so that can be fun.
Trachiniae is surprisingly good, I remembered thinking it was lame as an under-graduate but it turns out to be pretty cool.
However, Sophokles sounds like a good alternative, he works well with Homer and Herodotos anyway (the exact nature of the link between him and Herod. is debated incidentally). But yeah, I can sort of stand Sophokles, I get great use out of his fragments and recently re-read his entire extant corpus so that can be fun.
Trachiniae is surprisingly good, I remembered thinking it was lame as an under-graduate but it turns out to be pretty cool.
(Occasionally) Working on the following tutorials:
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
(P)Aristotle, Theophrastus and Peripatetic Greek
Intro Greek Poetry
Latin Historical Prose
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 408
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 3:57 pm
- Location: Antwerpen
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Markos wrote: Let us know how these compare. How much harder (if at all) is Plato than Herodotus, and how much more delightful (if at all) to read?
In my humble opinion Plato is the greatest Greek writer ever not named Homer.
Are you using Steadman?
I will give you my -highly subjective- opinion as soon as I have one. However, I don't think Herodotus has the reputation of being very difficult, but I might be wrong of course. And yes, I am using Steadman. Thanks for the link to the beta-version of Oedipus Rex.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1259
- Joined: Mon Sep 19, 2011 10:03 pm
Re: Why Not Herodotos?
Oh!, I didn't see that link before. I was operating on the assumption that author's don't usually give their books away.Bart wrote:Thanks for the link to the beta-version of Oedipus Rex.
C. Stirling Bartholomew