Textkit Logo

Which is more accurate?

Here's where you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get translation help and more!

Moderator: thesaurus

Which is more accurate?

Postby WilliamThomson » Mon Jun 03, 2013 10:53 pm

Which of these recordings do you think is more accurate? or are there others that I should be looking to? (Not just of Cicero's oration, but as indicative of classical pronunciation)

http://ia600300.us.archive.org/26/items ... 01_vbr.mp3


Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 12
Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 6:26 pm

Re: Which is more accurate?

Postby adrianus » Tue Jun 04, 2013 10:38 pm

Utra impressio praestans simulandaque, ut opinor.
Both are excellent and worth copying, I'd say.
I'm writing in Latin hoping for correction, and not because I'm confident in how I express myself. Latinè scribo ut ab omnibus corrigar, non quod confidenter me exprimam.
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 3270
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: Which is more accurate?

Postby Qimmik » Wed Jun 05, 2013 1:03 pm

Of course, only an ancient Roman could tell us which of these is more accurate, and there aren't many of them left. But to my somewhat hearing-impaired ears, the first clip seems to more accurately reflect the pronunciation of the spelling [vowel] + ns as a long nasalized vowel followed by /s/ in consilia, constrictam, consili, consul, whereas the second doesn't seem to do this, pronouncing these words just as they're spelled, i.e., with the cluster -ns-. See Allen, Vox Latina, p. 28.
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:15 pm

Return to Learning Latin

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Nesrad and 124 guests