In Pensum B LLPSI Roma Aeterna Orberg hoc responsum malum donat:
Aeneas omnibus intentis narrabat de insiidis Graecorum et de erroribus suis.
Num hoc verbum: insidiae, -arum (f) est ?
Definite mistake in Orberg's answer in Cap XXIX
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3270
- Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:45 pm
Re: Definite mistake in Orberg's answer in Cap XXIX
Nonné? Hoc responsum exspectat: est.
Num? Hoc responsum exspectat: non est.
Est quidem insidiae nomen, ut dicis.
Num? Hoc responsum exspectat: non est.
Est quidem insidiae nomen, ut dicis.
I'm writing in Latin hoping for correction, and not because I'm confident in how I express myself. Latinè scribo ut ab omnibus corrigar, non quod confidenter me exprimam.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am
Re: Definite mistake in Orberg's answer in Cap XXIX
Nonne dyslexiam Latinam habeo?
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 593
- Joined: Fri Nov 09, 2007 1:35 am
Re: Definite mistake in Orberg's answer in Cap XXIX
Salvete!
Fateor me nihil prorsus intellexisse! nam ipsi penso verbum quod est "insidiæ" deest, ad autem latus inscribitur probeque videtur. Ubi est mendum ab Orberg comissum?
Fateor me nihil prorsus intellexisse! nam ipsi penso verbum quod est "insidiæ" deest, ad autem latus inscribitur probeque videtur. Ubi est mendum ab Orberg comissum?
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 91
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:33 pm
Re: Definite mistake in Orberg's answer in Cap XXIX
It looks like in the answer key that accompanies the Teacher's Materials booklet, there is a simple typo for Cap. XXXIX Pensum B: *insiidīs in place of insidiīs.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 1341
- Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am
Re: Definite mistake in Orberg's answer in Cap XXIX
Funny...it's also wrong in the CDRom of the pensum.