Plb. 6.2.8

Here you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Greek, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Magna Graecia

Plb. 6.2.8

Post by pster »

ὅτι τὸ ψυχαγωγοῦν ἅμα καὶ τὴν ὠφέλειαν ἐπιφέρον τοῖς φιλομαθοῦσι τοῦτ᾽ ἔστιν ἡ τῶν αἰτιῶν θεωρία καὶ τοῦ βελτίονος ἐν ἑκάστοις αἵρεσις.

Translation (reversed for readability):

The theory of causes and of the best choice in each (case) is this that (is) the (thing) seducing and bringing help to the curious

Is there an implied copula (is) as I have indicated? Seems there has to be or else the subordinate lacks a verb.

NateD26
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am
Contact:

Re: Plb. 6.2.8

Post by NateD26 »

pster wrote:Is there an implied copula (is) as I have indicated? Seems there has to be or else the subordinate lacks a verb.
But this could be said of the main sentence as well. There is no verb in either clause.
What connects them is ἔστιν with τοῦτ᾽ referring to the entire subordinate clause.

I would also read the subordinate as relative clause with ὅτι representing ὅ τι.
This is supported by the Perseus translation (thanks for the link, btw):

What is really educational and beneficial to students of history is the clear view of the causes
of events, and the consequent power of choosing the better policy in a particular case.
Nate.

User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Magna Graecia

Re: Plb. 6.2.8

Post by pster »

NateD26 wrote:..There is no verb in either clause.
What connects them is ἔστιν...
You lost me there. I could probably agree with everything you wrote except this bit. Isn't ἔστιν the verb in the main clause? If not, then what is it?

NateD26
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am
Contact:

Re: Plb. 6.2.8

Post by NateD26 »

pster wrote:
NateD26 wrote:..There is no verb in either clause.
What connects them is ἔστιν...
You lost me there. I could probably agree with everything you wrote except this bit. Isn't ἔστιν the verb in the main clause? If not, then what is it?
I may be wrong. I've always looked at ἔστιν as a linking verb, that is, as neither
belongs to the subject nor the predicate.
Nate.

User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Magna Graecia

Re: Plb. 6.2.8

Post by pster »

Sure, but linking verbs are still verbs. Different grammarians define "predicate" differently. At least that seems to be my impression. I believe you about oti, but I can't bear to think about "that" again. I had a thread about "that" not too long ago and it ran out of gas before yielding any great insight.

Post Reply