μεγάλα: dual?

Here you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Greek, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Magna Graecia

μεγάλα: dual?

Post by pster »

...νομίζοντες οὐ μόνον πρὸς τὴν τῆς ἱστορίας σύνταξιν οἰκείαν εἶναι τὴν περὶ αὐτῆς ἐξήγησιν, ἀλλὰ καὶ πρὸς τὰς τῶν πολιτευμάτων διορθώσεις καὶ κατασκευὰς μεγάλα συμβάλλεσθαι τοῖς φιλομαθοῦσι καὶ πραγματικοῖς τῶν ἀνδρῶν.

Is μεγάλα dual feminine accusative here modifying the italicized items?

NateD26
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am
Contact:

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by NateD26 »

At first glance, it appears to be neut. pl. adj. used as adverb* to the infinitive,
which is the complement of νομίζοντες οὐ μόνον x ἀλλὰ καὶ y.

* I guess in some authors the sg. is more common than the pl. and in others,
such as (I assume) Polybius, the opposite applies.
Nate.

User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Magna Graecia

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by pster »

That's what I thought. But how do we know that there is such an adverbial form? This isn't a superlative.

NateD26
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am
Contact:

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by NateD26 »

Why does it have to be a superlative?
Nate.

User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Magna Graecia

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by pster »

For any superlative adjective, the neuter plural gives you the superlative adverb. Now of course there are some non superlative adjectives for which the neuter plural and/or singular gives you an adverb. But this doesn't appear to be such a case. Unless I am misreading LSJ:

http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/mor ... =1#lexicon

Wouldn't they have to list a plural neuter adverbial form if such a thing existed?

John W.
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:23 pm

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by John W. »

pster - any chance it could just mean 'contribute things of importance to ...', i.e. 'be very helpful to ...'?

Best wishes,

John

NateD26
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 789
Joined: Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:14 am
Contact:

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by NateD26 »

I would argue that, by its very nature, this adjective already conveys a somewhat larger or greater
than normal quantity/quality and having it as superlative would probably suggest
some superfluous or over-abundant quantity/quality. It's like "fun". Even though I hear
people saying "funner" and (less common) "funnest" (which is a pet peeve of mine),
"fun" by itself would suggest a thing/an event/etc. was rather pleasent and enjoyable
more than was expected. That's just my humble opinion. I'm open to corrections.
Nate.

User avatar
pster
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Magna Graecia

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by pster »

John W. wrote:pster - any chance it could just mean 'contribute things of importance to ...', i.e. 'be very helpful to ...'?

Best wishes,

John
Thanks John. I think you are right.

John W.
Textkit Enthusiast
Posts: 426
Joined: Sat Feb 04, 2012 12:23 pm

Re: μεγάλα: dual?

Post by John W. »

In working my way through Thucydides I've just come across this (6.64.1):

... τοὺς γὰρ ἂν ψιλοὺς τοὺς σφῶν καὶ τὸν ὄχλον τῶν Συρακοσίων τοὺς ἱππέας πολλοὺς ὄντας, σφίσι δ᾽ οὐ παρόντων ἱππέων, βλάπτειν ἂν μεγάλα, ...

'... since the Syracusans' cavalry, who were numerous while they themselves had none, would inflict great harm on their light-armed soldiers and camp followers, ...'

Smith says that μεγάλα here is cognate accusative; perhaps the same is true in your passage from Polybius.

Best wishes,

John

Post Reply