Scarlatti wrote:3) Is "dicentis" actually modified by "genus" from the preceding clause? That fits the translation best of all, perhaps. I don't know, my brain has frozen. But can a word from one clause modify a word from a subsequent clause without a relative pronoun?
Scarlatti wrote:Porro si mendacium est enuntiatio falsum enuntiare volentis ut fallat.
... Or is there an implied PERSON WHO IS WILLING? This is how it is translated.
Users browsing this forum: calvinist, Google Adsense [Bot] and 44 guests