decurri or decucurri

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
pmda
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am

decurri or decucurri

Post by pmda »

The principal parts of decurro are given in Whitakker as:

decurro, decurrere, decucurri, decursum

by 501 Latin Verbs as:

decurro, decurrere, decurri, decursum

A couple of website agree with 501 Latin verbs.....

Are they both correct..?

timeodanaos
Textkit Fan
Posts: 280
Joined: Fri Jul 13, 2007 10:36 pm
Location: Hafnia, Denmark

Re: decurri or decucurri

Post by timeodanaos »

Here's how Lewis and Short put it:
dē-curro, cŭcurri or curri (cf.: decucurrit, Caes. B. G. 2, 21; Tac. A. 2, 7; Suet. Ner. 11: decucurrerunt, Caes. B. G. 2, 19, 7; Petr. 64, 3: decucurrerat, Liv. 1, 12: decucurrisse, id. 25, 17; also, decurrerunt, id. 26, 51; 38, 8: decurrēre, Verg. A. 4, 153; 11, 189: decurrisset, Liv. 33, 26), cursum, 3,
Both forms, in other words, exist, and the reduplicated form seems to be classical. In Vergil, the unreduplicated form might be avoided metri causa, since decucurr- forms a cretic that doesn't fit his dactyls. Livius uses both forms, perhaps just because ... they both existed?

EDIT: Grammar is a descriptive science: if something exists and makes sense, we have to note it and accept it. It's sad but true, I think we would all prefer to have less forms to think about when learning a language.

EDIT EDIT: I think reduplication in general had a hard time in Latin: consider tuli, the perfect of fero, which originally was reduplicated ( = tetuli, you can find vestiges of it in the two t's of rettulit from refero), or consider spondeo, which sometimes loses its reduplication. There are probably other and better examples.

pmda
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 1339
Joined: Tue Apr 27, 2010 5:15 am

Re: decurri or decucurri

Post by pmda »

Many thanks.

Post Reply