in

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
User avatar
klewlis
Global Moderator
Posts: 1668
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

in

Post by klewlis »

this morning I was reading my greek-latin nt and noticed something interesting. where greek uses two different prepositions, eis and en, latin uses only one, in. So in 1 Peter 1:2 we have:

[size=150]εν αγιασμω πνευματος, εις υπακοην και ραντισμον αιματος ιησου χριστου[/size]

and

in sanctificationem Spiritus, in obedientiam, et aspersionem sanguinis Iesu Christi

with "in" functioning in place of both "en" and "eis". This causes me some distress because I know the semantic difference between en and eis and am therefore able to better translate the passage. But if I came upon the latin first and simply had "in .... in" it would be much harder to make that distinction. So my question is are there other clues as to the meaning of phrases like these, or are we dependent solely on interpretive context???
First say to yourself what you would be; then do what you need to do. ~Epictetus

User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California
Contact:

Post by benissimus »

This is why so many things are lost in translation and it is important to read things in their original texts if you wish to grasp the original sentiments! I'm not entirely clear at my beginning level of Greek what distinguishes "eis" from "en", but I would be interested to hear an explanation. My impression was that "en" is used to express position and "eis" is more of a motional preposition.
Last edited by benissimus on Mon Jan 12, 2004 8:04 am, edited 1 time in total.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae

Moerus
Textkit Fan
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Lovanium - Leuven (Belgium)

Post by Moerus »

In fact 'en' and 'eis' (I have not your Greeks fonts already, I have to download them soon, cause I feel the need to it :D ) are the same word.

Yes, 'en' and 'eis' are the same word (astonishing!). Firstly the choice of the case is obvious; the dative with 'en' to mark a position and an accusative with 'eis' to mark a sort of motion.

This difference also formed 'eis'. 'eis' origanally came form 'en' +'s'. This form 'ens' did evolve to 'eis'. The nu (n) dissapeared before a sigma (s)because off the laws of Greek fonetics. And if something dissapears, there must be a compensation for that in Greek fonetics (mostly so). So cause off the dissapearing off the nu (n) the vowel before it was lengthened from 'e' to 'ei = e+e'.

Here I gave you the fonetic analysis. When we look even closer and in comparation with other words, we see that sigma 's' is a suffix to denote a motion.

Conclusion: eis = en + s (suffix (signifies motion)) + the cases have the same difference.

In Latin we only have in+acc. in this text. So you can only see the difference by comparing with other texts or by seeing the forms in the contexts.
I have to agree with Benissimus on this: ' This is why so many things are lost in translation and it is important to read things in their original texts if you wish to grasp the original sentiments!'. The Italian have a proverb for this; traduttore - tradittore! (A translater is always a bit of a traitor!).

Greetz,

Moerus.

User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California
Contact:

Post by benissimus »

Interesting etymologyical note there. I want to know why the "en" was not translated with a in + abl., if it represents position instead of motion into.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae

Moerus
Textkit Fan
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Lovanium - Leuven (Belgium)

Post by Moerus »

I can only say that the distinction between in + abl. and in +acc. in ecclesiastical Latin is not as strict as in classical Latin. In christian texts they are sometimes used without the classical difference between motion and position.

Moerus.

User avatar
klewlis
Global Moderator
Posts: 1668
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by klewlis »

both of the phrases in my example use accusative, but it's clear that the first is more position and the second is more motion... are you saying that this is only because it's later, ecclesiastical latin, and that the same phrase in classical latin would be constructed differently?
First say to yourself what you would be; then do what you need to do. ~Epictetus

Moerus
Textkit Fan
Posts: 281
Joined: Sat Aug 02, 2003 2:00 am
Location: Lovanium - Leuven (Belgium)

Post by Moerus »

klewlis wrote:both of the phrases in my example use accusative, but it's clear that the first is more position and the second is more motion... are you saying that this is only because it's later, ecclesiastical latin, and that the same phrase in classical latin would be constructed differently?

Yes, indeed!

User avatar
klewlis
Global Moderator
Posts: 1668
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by klewlis »

ok then! thanks. :)
First say to yourself what you would be; then do what you need to do. ~Epictetus

Kasper
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 799
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Melbourne

Post by Kasper »

So would it be fair to say that 'en' means 'in' and 'eis' means 'into'?
“Cum ego verbo utar,” Humpty Dumpty dixit voce contempta, “indicat illud quod optem – nec plus nec minus.”
“Est tamen rogatio” dixit Alice, “an efficere verba tot res indicare possis.”
“Rogatio est, “Humpty Dumpty responsit, “quae fiat magister – id cunctum est.”

User avatar
klewlis
Global Moderator
Posts: 1668
Joined: Tue Jul 29, 2003 1:48 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Contact:

Post by klewlis »

Kasper wrote:So would it be fair to say that 'en' means 'in' and 'eis' means 'into'?
that's *generally* how it works.
First say to yourself what you would be; then do what you need to do. ~Epictetus

Post Reply