Textkit Logo

plenus

Here's where you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get translation help and more!

Moderator: thesaurus

plenus

Postby Kasper » Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:03 pm

According to my helpful grammar the word 'plenus' is accompanied with an ablative or a genitive.

Which is used when?
“Cum ego verbo utar,” Humpty Dumpty dixit voce contempta, “indicat illud quod optem – nec plus nec minus.”
“Est tamen rogatio” dixit Alice, “an efficere verba tot res indicare possis.”
“Rogatio est, “Humpty Dumpty responsit, “quae fiat magister – id cunctum est.”
Kasper
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 799
Joined: Wed Nov 05, 2003 3:01 am
Location: Melbourne

Postby whiteoctave » Sun Dec 21, 2003 10:21 pm

With plenus the so-called partitive genitive is generally used, which corresponds nicely to the english "full of...".
It can, however, as you note, take the ablative. This is more common in verse than prose and has the meaning more "abounding in...", so, one must presume, refers to a lesser state of fullness (although I wouldn't read too much into that).

Generally use the genitive.

~dave
User avatar
whiteoctave
Textkit Enthusiast
 
Posts: 603
Joined: Tue Sep 23, 2003 11:42 pm
Location: Cambridge

Postby Dionusius Philadelphus » Sun Dec 28, 2003 3:32 am

They are identical in meaning, owing largely no doubt to the same semantic gray area that saw the ablative absorbed by the genitive in Greek. The difference is largely stylistic, and the genitive is more common in Ciceronian Latin than elsewhere (within this period both are about equally distributed).

The ablative in question is one of means or instrument, which points back to the Indo-European instrumental case (extant in Sanskrit). This denotes that with or by which a thing is done. (The ablative also absorbed the locative case, but that's another story.)

The basic sense of the genitive case was origin, the ablative separation, so the lines are easily blurred (think: from America vs. of America; filled with water vs. full of water). Here the semantic distinction with the genitive is in a sense the source of its filling, but it's an extended use of the genitive.

There's a similar phenomenon in Greek. I'm thinking of an ode of Bachylides in which a word denoting fullness takes a genitive and a dative within two or three lines. This is because the instrumental case was absorbed by the dative in Greek.
phpbb
User avatar
Dionusius Philadelphus
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 10
Joined: Sat Dec 27, 2003 10:08 pm
Location: Metro Philly, USA

Postby Episcopus » Sun Dec 28, 2003 2:37 pm

Nice explanation :D
User avatar
Episcopus
Textkit Zealot
 
Posts: 2563
Joined: Sat Jun 14, 2003 8:57 pm


Return to Learning Latin

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 46 guests