erat invectus - Roma Aeterna XLV Lines 33–34

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
wilhelmjohnson
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 50
Joined: Sun Oct 13, 2013 7:01 pm

erat invectus - Roma Aeterna XLV Lines 33–34

Post by wilhelmjohnson »

Turnus Herdōnius ab Arīciā ferōciter in absentem Tarquinium erat invectus.

I have a syntax question here. Why is erat placed before invectus instead of after it as is usually the case?

Qimmik
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:15 pm

Re: erat invectus - Roma Aeterna XLV Lines 33–34

Post by Qimmik »

As you undoubtedly know, Latin word order is very flexible, and it's more or less independent of syntax. The past participle is the element of the periphrastic pluperfect form that carries the idea of the verb. Placing the past participle at the end of the sentence perhaps puts a slight emphasis on the verbal idea.

Post Reply