quam or et for "than"?

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
NelsonN
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

quam or et for "than"?

Post by NelsonN »

Should quam be more appropriate instead of the first et below?

Instead of:
Tu es mendax peior, mi amice, et Plauto et Terentio!

This:
Tu es mendax peior, mi amice, quam Plauto et Terentio!

I understand that "et" can be used as "than" as well.

Also, "et Plauto et Terentio!", was translated as "than both Plautus and Terence! " seems like a stretch to add the word "both" in the translation. Don't tell me that you can translate a single "et" into "than both" cause this will surely throw me for a loop.

As you can tell, I am scraching my head....

User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California
Contact:

Re: quam or et for "than"?

Post by benissimus »

NelsonN wrote:Should quam be more appropriate instead of the first et below?

Instead of:
Tu es mendax peior, mi amice, et Plauto et Terentio!
Et... et... is what means "both... and...".

The "than" comes from the Ablative of Comparison.
This:
Tu es mendax peior, mi amice, quam Plauto et Terentio!
This is redundant, as you should either choose quam or Ablative of Comparison. Your two choices are:

1.) ...et Plauto et Terentio!
2.) ...quam et Plautus et Terentius!

The et has nothing to do with "than"; the "both...and..." statement was grammatically entirely separate from the comparison.
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae

NelsonN
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 34
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2004 7:59 pm
Location: Puerto Rico
Contact:

Re: quam or et for "than"?

Post by NelsonN »

benissimus wrote:The et has nothing to do with "than"; the "both...and..." statement was grammatically entirely separate from the comparison.
OK. I re-read my dictionary again. Looks like I made a mistake when I was reading the definition of "et."

Thanks.

Post Reply