Odd comma

Here you can discuss all things Latin. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Latin, and more.
Post Reply
Lavrentivs
Textkit Fan
Posts: 226
Joined: Wed Oct 13, 2010 6:50 pm

Odd comma

Post by Lavrentivs »

Quare tamdiu cunctatus sum ut deinceps essem in culpâ, si quod temporis superest ad agendum, deliberando consumerem.

Is there any explanation of these odd commata? I would expect:

Quare tamdiu cunctatus sum ut deinceps essem in culpâ si quod temporis superest ad agendum deliberando consumerem.

or

Quare tamdiu cunctatus sum ut deinceps essem in culpâ si, quod temporis superest ad agendum, deliberando consumerem.

or

Quare tamdiu cunctatus sum ut deinceps essem in culpâ, si, quod temporis superest ad agendum, deliberando consumerem.

User avatar
lauragibbs
Textkit Member
Posts: 166
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:10 pm
Contact:

Re: Odd comma

Post by lauragibbs »

Commas are purely an editorial choice and conventions vary from country to country and from time to time and even from person to person. You could put a comma at any and all phrase and clause boundaries in the sentence. It's the editor's prerogative.

Quare : for this reason
tamdiu cunctatus sum : I was so long delayed
ut deinceps essem in culpâ : that henceforth I would be wrong
si : if
quod temporis superest ad agendum : which [amount] of time which remains for action
deliberando consumerem. : I were to consume [that amount] in deliberating.

An editor who was fond of commas might put them at each juncture:

Quare, tamdiu cunctatus sum, ut deinceps essem in culpâ, si, quod temporis superest ad agendum, deliberando consumerem.

MatthaeusLatinus
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:08 am

Re: Odd comma

Post by MatthaeusLatinus »

It's alſo good to know that the Ancients lacked punctuation altogether. Moreover, there were even no ſpaces between words.

QVARETAMDIVCVNCTATVSSVMVTDEICEPSESSEMINCVLPASIQVODTEMPORISSVPERESTADAGENDVMDELIBERANDOCONSVMEREM

would not have been unuſual.

adrianus
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 3270
Joined: Sun Sep 10, 2006 9:45 pm

Re: Odd comma

Post by adrianus »

Laurentius rightly says "commata" (nom. plural). Whitaker's Words wrongly says comma is first declension (at least in the edition I have). Words has mistakes but is still very handy, of course.

Rectè dicit Laurentius qui "commata" pluraliter scribit. Errat Whitaker qui id primae declinationis habet, secundum programma eius, Words nomine (per eam editionem saltem quam habeo). Menda quidem habet programma at et perutile est.
I'm writing in Latin hoping for correction, and not because I'm confident in how I express myself. Latinè scribo ut ab omnibus corrigar, non quod confidenter me exprimam.

MatthaeusLatinus
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 79
Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2011 12:08 am

Re: Odd comma

Post by MatthaeusLatinus »

Whikater's hath plenty miſtakes.

Post Reply