Page 1 of 1

ou(= in Luke 3:17

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 2:05 am
by Bert

Re: ou(= in Luke 3:17

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 5:56 am
by Kopio

PostPosted: Thu Apr 13, 2006 11:28 am
by IreneY
well, I don't have a Bible around (not at home and I can't seem to access the only site with the texts I know) so I am don't know what is before it and whether it is at the beginning of a new sentence or not , so I am just guessing here but it seems that Kopio's suggestion makes sence.

The relative after all is often used instead of ostis etc

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 1:22 am
by Bert
Thanks to both of you.
I think that when ever I run into this construction again, it will put me dead in my tracks again. Even now, I cannot read this sentence without translating it in my mind.

PostPosted: Fri Apr 14, 2006 4:56 pm
by Bert

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 6:32 am
by Kopio

PostPosted: Sat Apr 15, 2006 12:11 pm
by Bert
Kopio wrote:Not only does it make more sense....it also comes from a much more reliable sorce! Hofstetter is pretty solid :)

You found my post. :)

PostPosted: Sun Apr 16, 2006 12:26 am
by Kopio
Bert wrote:You found my post. :)

Yes I did....I follow B-Greek quite a bit. From time to time I even ask questions....and even more rarely....I'll chime in when a question is asked and I feel I have something to add (although this has been rarely indeed!) FWIW, you give a perfectly good example, and Albert is simply refusing to concede the point!

Carl Conrad is my hero. I wanna be just like him when I grow up.....really....I mnean it!