Textkit Logo


Are you learning Koine Greek, the Greek of the New Testament and most other post-classical Greek texts? Whatever your level, use this forum to discuss all things Koine, Biblical or otherwise, including grammar, textbook talk, difficult passages, and more.


Postby ragnar_deerslayer » Sat Jul 30, 2011 2:08 am

Why is the aorist of ἰσχύω ἴσχυσα? Why doesn't it take an augment and become εἰσχυσα or ἠσχυσα? Mounce's Morphology put it in "the largest category of verbs and most 'regular'" (page 250).

(Working on Mark 14:37)

Read my blog! --> Study Greek
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 40
Joined: Tue Feb 15, 2011 9:33 pm
Location: Northeast Georgia

Re: ἰσχύω

Postby IreneY » Mon Aug 01, 2011 12:35 am

Well, it does take an augment, but it's an invisible one :D
The iota becomes a long iota but since they are both written the same way we can't see it.
Check Smyth's grammar (or any other you want to obviously) about vowels and temporal augments (here's a link for Smyth's online)
User avatar
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 800
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2006 8:27 am
Location: U.S.A (not American though)

Re: ἰσχύω

Postby refe » Tue Aug 16, 2011 8:12 pm

It does seem a bit confusing, but fortunately Mounce is right and the form of verbs like ἰσχύω are very regular, so the 'σα' tense formative makes the aorist form easy to spot. There is a similar 'recognition' issue with verbs that take vocalic reduplication, where at first it can be hard to tell that a perfect has reduplicated and it almost looks like a simple augment. In both cases the important thing is to focus on the differences, and recognition will come.
εἰς ἔπαινον δόξης τῆς χάριτος αὐτοῦ
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 48
Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2011 4:08 pm
Location: Kansas City

Return to Koine and Biblical and Medieval Greek