Bert wrote:[face=SPIonic]a)ndrw=n au)= me/g' a)/ristoj e)/hn Telamw/nioj Ai)/aj
o)/fr' )Axileu\j mh/nien: o(\ ga\r polu\ fe/rtatoj h)=en,[/face]
Is there some rule of thumb to determine the antecedent to a pronoun?
What pronoun should have been used if it did refer to Telamw/nioj?
Unless context dictates otherwise, I think it's safest to assume that this anaphoric use of the article refers to the person or thing just mentioned (cf. 1.9, 1.404, 1.581).
Sometimes context governs, as in 1.12.
Although [face=SPIonic]e)kei=noj[/face] is primarily deictic, it can also be used anaphorically. This pronoun would, I think, be used to denote the remoter (earlier in the text) antecedent.
But I think the context of 768-770 also makes clear that the 'article' refers to Achilles.
Users browsing this forum: Bart and 27 guests