hi, after lunch I've come back to this little point again; Willcock also takes ti with mh/.
on reading Goodwin's section again he may be taking ti (neut. acc.) as adverb to r(e/ch| (i.e. r(e/ch| ti), not as indefinite to kako/n (i.e. kako/n ti) as I first read him, I'm not sure exactly how he takes it
oh yeah and I meant Iliad 1.28 in my first post, not 1.26. I was just reading Goodwin 263 about this before I posted.