Eureka wrote:Is this just [face=SPIonic]e)n[/face] +dative with the [face=SPIonic]e)n[/face] left off?
Or, is the meaning in any way different from [face=SPIonic]e)n[/face] +dative?
annis wrote: and this poetic usage is the last vestage of it
Eureka wrote:So, it’s basically the exact opposite of what I guessed. Perhaps I need to look at the Sanscrit noun cases and find their Greek equivalents, to see the logic behind there things.
Bert wrote:annis wrote: and this poetic usage is the last vestage of it
Do you mean that this usage is mostly poetic?
I think that Romans 14:10 is an instance of dative of location ([face=SPIonic]pa/ntej ga\r parasthso/meqa tw| bh/mati tou= qeou=.[/face])
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, ÓBuadhaigh and 12 guests