Textkit Logo

Enclitics and accentuation

Are you learning Latin with Latin: An Intensive Course by Moreland and Fleischer? Here's where you can meet other learners using this textbook. Use this board to ask questions and post your work for feedback.

Enclitics and accentuation

Postby phil96 » Fri May 08, 2009 3:19 am

When an enclitic such as -ne or -que is appended to a word does it alter the word's accentuation? M&F's Glossary seems to imply it doesn't ("An enclitic ... loses its own accent").

Does that mean that "optavistis" and "optavistisne?" should both be pronounced with the stress on the third syllable, rather than on what looks like the penult of each? And that "..tisne" acts as one syllable?
phil96
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia

Re: Enclitics and accentuation

Postby benissimus » Fri May 08, 2009 5:15 am

I believe that the most commonly held belief is that word is accented on the syllable directly preceding the enclitic (the ultima of the word before the enclitic is added): optavístis > optavistísne
flebile nescio quid queritur lyra, flebile lingua murmurat exanimis, respondent flebile ripae
User avatar
benissimus
Global Moderator
Global Moderator
 
Posts: 2733
Joined: Mon May 12, 2003 4:32 am
Location: Berkeley, California

Re: Enclitics and accentuation

Postby phil96 » Fri May 08, 2009 6:21 am

Gratias tibi ago.
phil96
Textkit Neophyte
 
Posts: 63
Joined: Mon Apr 27, 2009 3:05 am
Location: Melbourne, Australia


Return to M&F's Latin: An Intensive Course

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests