When did the sigma begin to be written looking like "c" ?
A book I bought for some supplementary translations, the "teach yourself" series "ancient Greek" writes all its sigmas as "c" or "C".
In the course of two years in my university courses, the sigma was never written this way . I had thought it was perhaps a medieval or byzantine development.
Is this an error on the part of this text book?
Historical Question
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Fri Dec 26, 2008 8:34 pm
- anglicus
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 28
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2003 6:50 pm
- Location: Arizona
- Contact:
Re: Historical Question
It's not an error. I've heard it's becoming more popular to use the lunate sigma since it avoids the issue of having two forms of the same letter. Supposedly it derives from some ancient variant of the alphabet, but was popularized more in the middle ages, I think. I'm sure someone here has more details.
I started learning with that book and thought it was weird, but got used to it and wrote out all my flash cards using it. But once I started reading other things, I started to get annoyed with it, so now I've gone over to σ and ς.
I started learning with that book and thought it was weird, but got used to it and wrote out all my flash cards using it. But once I started reading other things, I started to get annoyed with it, so now I've gone over to σ and ς.
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:52 pm
Re: Historical Question
hi, the lunate sigma is ancient; see this table of letters used in ancient papyri (remove spaces):
www . freewebs . com / mhninaeide / Thompson . pdf
cheers
www . freewebs . com / mhninaeide / Thompson . pdf
cheers
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:33 am
Re: Historical Question
Indeed, it is a medieval Byzantine development. Note the ICXC iconic abbreviation for "Jesus Christ" from the first and last letters of each word in Greek.Jordan St. Francis wrote:When did the sigma begin to be written looking like "c" ?
A book I bought for some supplementary translations, the "teach yourself" series "ancient Greek" writes all its sigmas as "c" or "C".
In the course of two years in my university courses, the sigma was never written this way . I had thought it was perhaps a medieval or byzantine development.
Is this an error on the part of this text book?
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 764
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2007 3:52 pm
Re: Historical Question
hi, it's not a byzantine development. it's ancient. see the link in my above post, cheers
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:33 am
Re: Historical Question
Sure thing. I wouldn't want to disturb your homework project.cb wrote:hi, it's not a byzantine development. it's ancient. see the link in my above post, cheers
-
- Textkit Zealot
- Posts: 3399
- Joined: Fri Jan 03, 2003 4:55 pm
- Location: Madison, WI, USA
- Contact:
Re: Historical Question
It's more a fad.Jordan St. Francis wrote:Is this an error on the part of this text book?
William S. Annis — http://www.aoidoi.org/ — http://www.scholiastae.org/
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
τίς πατέρ' αἰνήσει εἰ μὴ κακοδαίμονες υἱοί;
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Tue Oct 28, 2003 4:33 am
Re: Historical Question
Chuckle...very good.annis wrote:It's more a fad.Jordan St. Francis wrote:Is this an error on the part of this text book?