Why an optative? (Eur. IT. 85-86)

Here you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get help with a difficult passage of Greek, and more.
Post Reply
GJCaesar
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 12:16 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Why an optative? (Eur. IT. 85-86)

Post by GJCaesar »

Euripides' IT, 85-86:

''σὺ δ᾽ εἶπας ἐλθεῖν Ταυρικῆς μ᾽ ὅρους χθονός,
ἔνθ᾽ Ἄρτεμίς σοι σύγγονος βωμοὺς ἔχοι'' (Orestes speaking just after he and Pylades reached the temple)

So, this might be an odd question, but for some reason, I can't understand the optative here. And why is it present tense?

GJC
vincatur oportet aut vincat

Qimmik
Textkit Zealot
Posts: 2090
Joined: Mon Mar 18, 2013 10:15 pm

Re: Why an optative? (Eur. IT. 85-86)

Post by Qimmik »

This is the optative in a subordinate clause in indirect discourse after a verb in a historical tense.

Smyth 2619: http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex ... tion%3D151

On the tense, see Smyth 1862:
Optative (in indirect discourse).—When the optative in indirect discourse represents the indicative after a past tense of a verb of saying or thinking, each tense does denote time (as well as stage of action) relatively to that of the leading verb.
a. The present optative represents the imperfect as well as the present indicative.


http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/tex ... tion%3D123

GJCaesar
Textkit Neophyte
Posts: 97
Joined: Mon May 20, 2013 12:16 pm
Location: Amsterdam

Re: Why an optative? (Eur. IT. 85-86)

Post by GJCaesar »

Ah yes, of course. I just didn't see it, but you perfectly clear explanation solves the problem!

GJC
vincatur oportet aut vincat

Post Reply