Textkit Logo

Is this an omittion of infinitive ?

Here's where you can discuss all things Ancient Greek. Use this board to ask questions about grammar, discuss learning strategies, get translation help and more!

Is this an omittion of infinitive ?

Postby Junya » Mon Apr 01, 2013 9:22 pm

I'm sorry.
As soon as I posted this question, I realised.
The sunapton was not an adjective sunaptos, but the participle sunapto^n of sunapto^.
I'm sorry.


Hi.

The place in the Googlebooks.
https://play.google.com/store/books/det ... AAJ&rdot=1
(Iamblichus' De Mysteriis)

p.28

The paragraph 2

Ti to sunapton esti pros aso^matois theois tous echontas so^ma en to^i ourano^i ?


The Latin translation displayed in the same page is thus :

Quid sit quod cum diis incorporeis deos in caelo corporeos connectat ?
(What would be that which connects the corporeal gods in heaven with the incorporeal gods ?)


By the Latin I understand the meaning, but I don't clearly see the grammatical structure of the Greek.
(Is this an omittion of the infinitive of sunaptomai ? Can the infinitive of verbs other than einai be omitted ?) Someone please explain to me.
Junya
Textkit Enthusiast
 
Posts: 452
Joined: Thu Dec 27, 2007 2:26 am
Location: Japan

Return to Learning Greek

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Feedfetcher, Paco and 38 guests