contonation and mora question
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 1:20 pm
- Contact:
contonation and mora question
If an enclitic extends the word unit, then why would ἀγαθῷ τῳ not be accented as ἀγαθῳ& τῳ since the enclitic τῳ represents two morae?
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 426
- Joined: Mon Mar 29, 2004 8:58 pm
- Location: Rhenen
- Contact:
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:18 am
- Location: Belgium
According to J. Vendryes, 1945 [1903], the circumflex on ἀγαθῷ τινι should be seen as a mere graphic convention. Definitely not a sexy explanation
But there is also a tendency to save the accent of the accented word, that was, I suppose, part of the "image" of the word, hence also the accent on ἐλέγετό ποτε, where the first accent is theoretically unnecessary.
So Greek faced a contradiction : word + enclitic = a single word, yet two words on the other hand.
Lejeune [1948] describes also how Greek changed the indo-european enclitic system.
But there is also a tendency to save the accent of the accented word, that was, I suppose, part of the "image" of the word, hence also the accent on ἐλέγετό ποτε, where the first accent is theoretically unnecessary.
So Greek faced a contradiction : word + enclitic = a single word, yet two words on the other hand.
Lejeune [1948] describes also how Greek changed the indo-european enclitic system.
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 1:20 pm
- Contact:
Whose graphical convention? Aristophanes of Byzantium created the accentuation marks only in the 3rd century BC, so Attic Greek didn't even carry these marks. Was it the graphical convention of the later Greek's then? If it affects the pronunciation, then it can't be simply a graphical convention, can it?Skylax wrote:According to J. Vendryes, 1945 [1903], the circumflex on ἀγαθῷ τινι should be seen as a mere graphic convention. Definitely not a sexy explanation
Skylax wrote:But there is also a tendency to save the accent of the accented word, that was, I suppose, part of the "image" of the word, hence also the accent on ἐλέγετό ποτε, where the first accent is theoretically unnecessary.
So Greek faced a contradiction : word + enclitic = a single word, yet two words on the other hand.
Lejeune [1948] describes also how Greek changed the indo-european enclitic system.
-
- Textkit Enthusiast
- Posts: 672
- Joined: Fri Jun 06, 2003 8:18 am
- Location: Belgium
Well, who knows, ὦ βέλτιστε ? I only quoted Vendryes' comment.eliliang wrote:Whose graphical convention?
According to Lejeune [1947], Greek accent was still a pitch-accent, not yet a stress-accent, in the times of Aristophanes. In this case, there are two possibilities :Aristophanes of Byzantium created the accentuation marks only in the 3rd century BC, so Attic Greek didn't even carry these marks. Was it the graphical convention of the later Greek's then? If it affects the pronunciation, then it can't be simply a graphical convention, can it?
- Greek has broken the three morae limitation law in order to retain the original accent on ἀγαθῷ, and the written accent would reflect the actual pronounciation. After all, Attic retained the accent on the omicron in πόλεως after the change from πόληος.
- Aristophanes or someone else has recommended to retain graphically the circumflex accent even when it was pronounced as an acute.
Indeed, there is something apparently inconsistent here, because the apparently logical solution *ἀγαθῷ τινί, like in λόγοι τινές was never used. So Vendryes states that from the accent viewpoint ἀγαθῷ τινι is equivalent to ἐδηλώσατο "because the accented vowel is no final vowel anymore" after the enclitic was added. [French : "La dernière syllabe du mot orthotonique n'est donc pas en pareil cas une syllabe finale : elle cesse par conséquent d'être intonable et ne compte plus que pour un temps de brève" (J. VENDRYES, Traité d'accentuation grecque, Paris, 1945, § 88)]
-
- Textkit Neophyte
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 1:20 pm
- Contact:
Thanks for this info! Both of your alternatives seem rather possible.Skylax wrote:Well, who knows, ὦ βέλτιστε ? I only quoted Vendryes' comment.eliliang wrote:Whose graphical convention?
According to Lejeune [1947], Greek accent was still a pitch-accent, not yet a stress-accent, in the times of Aristophanes. In this case, there are two possibilities :Aristophanes of Byzantium created the accentuation marks only in the 3rd century BC, so Attic Greek didn't even carry these marks. Was it the graphical convention of the later Greek's then? If it affects the pronunciation, then it can't be simply a graphical convention, can it?
- Greek has broken the three morae limitation law in order to retain the original accent on ἀγαθῷ, and the written accent would reflect the actual pronounciation. After all, Attic retained the accent on the omicron in πόλεως after the change from πόληος.
- Aristophanes or someone else has recommended to retain graphically the circumflex accent even when it was pronounced as an acute.
Indeed, there is something apparently inconsistent here, because the apparently logical solution *ἀγαθῷ τινί, like in λόγοι τινές was never used. So Vendryes states that from the accent viewpoint ἀγαθῷ τινι is equivalent to ἐδηλώσατο "because the accented vowel is no final vowel anymore" after the enclitic was added. [French : "La dernière syllabe du mot orthotonique n'est donc pas en pareil cas une syllabe finale : elle cesse par conséquent d'être intonable et ne compte plus que pour un temps de brève" (J. VENDRYES, Traité d'accentuation grecque, Paris, 1945, § 88)]