by adz000 » Fri May 23, 2003 9:37 pm
hi!<br /><br />I've been going through North & Hillard as a summer review for Greek composition and though it's in general a great course, I've found a few minor errors in the answer key that might be worth paying attention to: an agreement problem, the creation of a new accent (pro-proparoxytone anyone?), using 'aireo in the passive in the wrong sense, and in one case neglecting to translate into Greek a phrase "of the king". And I'm only on exercise 27.<br /><br />I realize these are just quibbles and it would be impossible to fix the pdf files manually, but I'm wondering whether there is any cause for creating an accompanying file to list some corrigenda. I'd offer everything I have so far, which may or may not be totally correct since I make no claims for my Greek ability; but there's the chance that if I get too frustrated (not to mention sick of soldiers conquered and pretty gifts given) I may switch to a different composition course. In terms of writing good, continuous, real dead Greek there might be better options. N&H seems to want to present everything to the schoolboy as a cut-and-dry rule so that he or she can then be beaten in the proper Victorian manner, when the options for the Attic writer are far more flexible. Have other people found similar problems with N&H? Is it a popular enough choice that you think corrections would be helpful?<br />Comments anyone.<br /><br />Best,<br />Adam
phpbb