I got stuck today at Pl. Ap. 31e2 where we have these reinforced negatives. I finally understood what they are only after checking my commentary,
and I couldn't find a reference in Smyth. Are there any rules put in place for a student to recognize when a negative comes merely to reinforce
the previous one, not to negate it? Is it always after phrases like οὐκ ἔστιν ὅστις/οὐδεὶς ὅστις that a following statement would have, if required,
Here, οὔτε ὑμῖν οὔτε ἄλλῳ πλήθει οὐδενὶ after οὐκ ἔστιν ὅστις σωθήσεται is translated as καὶ ὑμῖν καὶ ἄλλῳ πλήθει τινὶ
I know this occurred already in previous sections, but I have trouble internalizing it.