Textkit Logo

BLD: §135 Imperfect Active Inidcative

Are you learning Latin with D'Ooge's Beginners Latin Book? Here's where you can meet other learners using this textbook. Use this board to ask questions and post your work for feedback and comments from others.

BLD: §135 Imperfect Active Inidcative

Postby Timothy » Sun Apr 25, 2004 6:03 am

§135 I

3. Pugnant, laudabas, movebatis
K: they were fighting, you were praising, they were moving.

Should be:
They do fight, you were praising, You were moving.

6. Videbant, movebas, nuntiabamus
K: they were seeing, you were moving, they were announcing.

Should be:
they were seeing, you were moving, We were announcing.

7. Necabat, movebam, habebat, parabatis
K. they were killing, I was moving, he was having, they were preparing.

Should be:
He was killing, I was moving, he was having, You were preparing.

Under the heading "Am I getting ahead of the myself?"

If memory serves, the other forms of translation for the imperfect tense are similar to those used for the present indicative i.e

amabam
I loved,
I did love,
I was loving.


I find that these forms lead to a more natural translation i.e movebat, (He moved.) It sort of stuck out that those forms weren't introduced. However, there may be a "perfect/pluperfect" something or other that distinguishes between "was moving" and "moved" in terms of a past act in progress and a past, completed act. So I don't want to start using a translation that will conflict with a later lesson.

- Tim
User avatar
Timothy
Textkit Enthusiast
 
Posts: 374
Joined: Sat Apr 03, 2004 3:16 pm
Location: Baltimore

Postby ingrid70 » Mon Apr 26, 2004 7:36 pm

Those pesky verb forms. *sigh*

Ingrid
ingrid70
Textkit Enthusiast
 
Posts: 394
Joined: Wed Dec 04, 2002 6:29 pm
Location: The Netherlands


Return to Latin For Beginners by D'Ooge

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests