The more I find out about Linear B, the weirder and wackier the claims about its decipherment seem to be. For example, in the first chapters of Horrocks, we get repeated claims about the unexpected absence of expected linguistic developments. This is all very strange.
However, these sorts critiques seem explosive:
http://www.sunypress.edu/p-494-the-line ... contr.aspx
So where is the modern skepticism? I can’t ...